bg-image

Friday of the Seventh Week in Ordinary Time

1 Jas. 5: 9-12; Mk. 10: 1-12

The readings and responsorial for this day link three themes: perseverance, mercy, and truth in marriage.  “Let your ‘Yes’ mean ‘Yes’ and your ‘No’ mean ‘No”.  It reminds me of another common saying “say what you mean and mean what you say”.  The God of truth isn’t interested in excuses, his word is truth and he who seeks truth is consecrated to Him.  The issue of marriage and divorce is a “hot” debate in the church under Pope Francis.  Pope Francis has encouraged the church in mercy to review applications for annulment with greater efficiency and expediency so couples can receive the sacraments.  In the last few years there is the debate of whether a divorced person remarried can receive communion.  The church recognizes today’s gospel as a sign of “No”.  It is an adulterous relationship.

Why do Pharisees in the gospel event ask the question?  They know the laws of the temple and Jesus lets them answer their own question, it is “Yes”.  They were testing Jesus in defense of all their laws to accuse him if he dared to claim otherwise.  “Because of the hardness of your hearts” God allows Moses to make for special circumstances.  The fact they ask the question indicates the possibility this allowance was abused, a simple way out of marriage for convenience, a sin before God.  Jesus provides the perfect truth.

Recall the story in scripture of the woman who marries seven brothers and each dies on their wedding night.  Whose wife will she be is asked of Jesus.  His response is that in heaven there is no marriage, our joy will be God.  We live in times where divorce is more common that fidelity to a marriage and perseverance to our commitment is not a virtue of value but an inconvenience.  A divorce person however can still receive the sacraments.   The sin is in remarriage without annulment of the first marriage.  Annulment recognizes that the first marriage is invalid opening the door to remarriage in view of the circumstances.

Pope Francis in “Amoris Laetitia” opened the dialogue for remarried couples to receive communion reaffirming the Catholic teaching on the “primacy of conscience”.  The CCC 1790 states “individuals are obligated to follow their conscience” but the church recognizes it must be an informed conscience by church teaching or risk falling into moral relativism.  Recently in a letter to the Argentine bishops in Buenos Aires he declared his letter as “authentic magisterium” which means “official teaching” of the church.  In the letter he provides “guidelines” on handling divorce and remarried Catholics.  In the guidelines he asserts “that in certain circumstances, a person who is divorced and remarried and is living in an active sexual partnership might not be responsible or culpable for the mortal sin of adultery.  The guidelines add that “Amoris Laetitia” opens up the possibility of access to the sacraments of Reconciliation and Eucharist.”  The Dogmatic Constitution on the Church, Lumen Gentium states the faithful are instructed to give a “religious submission of mind and will” to teachings that are authentic magisterium though the teaching may not be an infallible “declaration on faith and morals” (National Review, Tyler Arnold, 12.12.17, 5:00 p.m.)  Thus the debate in need of truth and reconciliation.

Jesus says to the disciples after the resurrection “Whose sins you forgive are forgiven and whose sins you retain are retained” (Jn. 20:23).  The church is given great authority for right judgement of truth but also for mercy.  The Holy Father who stresses dialogue has begun a very important one in an age of high divorce rates.  Why is it so high?  There is no one answer.  One thing I have seen in my years as a counselor is that couples don’t know their spouse.  The reason is not always a lack of attention, especially in the beginning when everything is done “together”.  To know the other, the other must know themselves and share who they are as a person, not just justify their behavior as “this is who I am”.  Confusion and misunderstanding comes from a lack of deeper sense of awareness of who God created us to be and living it out.  If we now ourselves as a child of God we grow in maturity, secure in who we are and able to be open about our inner self.  The reality is we are in continuous growth and development in every stage of life and every stage has its unique challenges of life.

In conclusion I share a story of my parents.  One day while visiting my mother she shared she did not know what else to do with my father.  He had become so difficult to live with and her tolerance had reached a climax.  Knowing some of what she was referring to understanding the circumstances of their situation, and the power to change rested in him not her.  I said simply, “Mother that is your cross to bear.”  She would often remind me of what I had said to her that day and it seemed that it allowed her to place it in perspective of a spiritual sacrifice she could bear finding meaning in her struggle in marriage.  Our first reading reminds us of the need for perseverance, “In good times and in bad” all for the glory of God.

Tags
Shared this
Views

241 views


bg-image

Second Week of Ordinary Time Tuesday 2018

1 Sm. 16:1-13; Mk. 2:23-28

When one hears “Amoris Laetitia” what comes to mind?  Perhaps to the world it has no meaning.  Others know it is an encyclical from Pope Francis but not much else.  Some understand the encyclical is about “love” especially the love of neighbor.  In church circles there is much focus and discussion on one particular chapter which appears to imply that it is possible for persons divorced and remarried without an annulment of the first marriage to receive communion.  This is an interpretation that some within the church seek to have a clarification from the Pope.  Cardinal Parolin, Vatican Secretary of State has called this section of the encyclical a “paradigm shift” and a “new spirit”.  Others fear this teaching is outside of the church doctrine on adultery and the law of God.

In today’s gospel Jesus comes and his acts are considered outside the law of God.  The Pharisees see that by picking the heads of the grain they violate the laws of the temple and church tradition.  Jesus announces two important points in his response to the Pharisees.  First “The Sabbath was made for man and not man for the Sabbath.”  Second, the “Son of Man is lord even of the Sabbath.”   Looking at the first point he reminds the Pharisees that the law of God is for the good of humanity.  How the law is applied has to have a universal good if we all belong to the same body of God.  When the body is attached by cancer the cancer cells are living off of the body causing the body to suffer and die.  The cancerous cells live for themselves and not for the whole body.  If the law of love gives life to the universal body of God then it is a good but if it lives for itself and the universal body suffers then the interpretation is not from God.  The second point is of same importance.  The Son of Man, Emmanuel, God with us in Jesus governs the law.  He then gives the example where David violates the law of the temple to do a good to meet the need of hunger.  Here we see a conflict between the personal need and the body of faith and how Jesus judges what is good.

The Church universal speaks to the fact that the act of sin is always judged the same.  While the act remains a sin it also much judges the intention, the understanding, and the free will to commit the act.  This does not indicate the act was not a sin but the circumstances also are a factor.  This reminds me of a Spanish saying translated as “all cannot be covered with the same blanket”, thus all are not judged the same.  You must judge the universal good and the personal good together so that love may be fruitful.

This encyclical reminds me when the Vatican II documents were published.  The interpretations led some to understand the documents to mean a change of paradigm and a new spirit.  There were changes such as the priest turning to face the people during mass instead of giving his back.  Mass began to be held in the local language instead of Latin.  Statues of saints were less displayed in the church to catechism began changing to themes more applicable to social life and not memorization of doctrine.  The outcome was mixed.  The people understood more the rites and participated more in the mass.  There was greater awareness of the church body obligation to participate in the gospel message and in evangelizing others to the faith.  There is the recognition that there are large number of Catholics who do not know their faith, don’t study their faith, and don’t come regularly to mass with a desire to worship in thanksgiving but in silence seeking to receive more than to give.

We see the law of God is universal and personal because it exists both in the church and in the human heart.  It must live and give fruit in both.  Thus in the first reading of Samuel we see how God works is not with human eyes.  Samuel sees with human eyes and believes God picks Eliab for king to rule the people.  Eliab was of “lofty stature” and his appearance must have been of a strong leader.  From all the seven sons God selects David, the youngest and sheep herder and says, “There – anoint him, for this is he! …and from that day on, the Spirit of the Lord rushed upon David”.

We all receive through our baptism the oil of catechumens and the oil of charism that God will increase our understanding and the Spirit descend and remain with us.   May we lead our people, our homes according to his will and our lives be free from sin y filled with the grace of his love.

The hope of God in David and in us is for a response in faith to God as our Father, our strength, our salvation united as one body and not divided by the law.  He judges our actions and knows our hearts and fulfills the law in our hearts.  Some wish to take Amoris Laetitia to say the new spirit accepts and blesses relationships committed to homosexuality.  Others interpret it to include the need to accept some level of artificial birth control.  Careful with taking liberty that some seek to have that brings confusion where the devil manifests itself.  It is not of God who is the God of truth, goodness, beauty, and love.  May the God of love triumph!

Tags
Shared this
Views

290 views